BETAData may changefutbolfutbol is in beta: the ranking, data and rules are still being tested and can change. Found a mistake? Tell us

futbolfutbol is in beta: the ranking, data and rules are still being tested and can change. Found a mistake? Tell us

BETA
El Salvador
El Salvador206Guatemala157

Coming soon

Central America

Costa RicaHondurasNicaraguaPanama

North America

Mexico

Caribbean

JamaicaHaitiTrinidad and TobagoCuraçaoDominican RepublicCubaPuerto RicoMartiniqueSurinameAll countries
Log inSign upENESSwitch theme (light or dark)
El Salvador
El Salvador206Guatemala157

Coming soon

Central America

Costa RicaHondurasNicaraguaPanama

North America

Mexico

Caribbean

JamaicaHaitiTrinidad and TobagoCuraçaoDominican RepublicCubaPuerto RicoMartiniqueSurinameAll countries

FutbolFutbol · Research & development

Making player evaluation inspectable

An independent football analytics project exploring how transparent ratings, data quality and coach-informed evaluation can support player assessment and scouting.

Read the RPIX methodology Research enquiries

Project and responsibility

Organization: FutbolFutbol
Project lead: Mario Casamalhuapa
Focus: football analytics, player evaluation and research software.

FutbolFutbol is an independent project. This page documents its current development work and proposed research agenda; it does not represent university affiliation or institutional accreditation.

Current work: RPIX

RPIX is an experimental player-rating framework implemented in the FutbolFutbol platform. The site publishes its methodology, player profiles, source references and comparison tools so that users can examine the inputs behind a score.

Current development includes position-based player comparisons, squad and lineup exploration, and clearly labelled AI explanations of supplied statistics. A generated explanation is not independent evidence that a rating or conclusion is correct.

Method and version history · About the project

Research questions

  1. Validity: Do player ratings add useful information beyond simple measures such as minutes played?
  2. Robustness: How sensitive are comparisons to weights, missing data, position groups and competition context?
  3. Practical use: Where do quantitative comparisons agree or disagree with coaches, and what explains those differences?

Proposed evaluation programme

The following studies are proposed, not completed findings. Before each study, we intend to specify the question, eligible sample, comparison baseline and evaluation criteria.

  • Time-separated evaluation: freeze ratings and data dates before assessing later outcomes, to reduce leakage from future information.
  • Sensitivity analysis: vary weighting choices and missing-data treatment, and report which conclusions remain stable.
  • Coach review: collect structured assessments and document agreement and disagreement without treating either a coach or an algorithm as an infallible reference.

Data and reproducibility

Transfermarkt is the principal player-profile source identified by the project; ESPN is used for selected cross-checks and fixtures. Sources and dates should be inspected on the relevant profiles. Access to a public website does not itself grant a licence to redistribute its data.

For proposed studies, the aim is to document methodology versions, inclusion rules, data cutoffs, corrections and evaluation procedures. Sharing of underlying data will depend on the applicable permissions; this page offers no third-party dataset for download.

Limitations and research status

RPIX remains experimental. This page makes no claim of peer-reviewed validation, calibrated win probabilities or established predictive accuracy. A squad average is not a starting lineup, and a player rating does not capture every tactical role or contribution.

Coverage, playing time, position definitions and missing observations can affect comparisons. Market context and youth-related components require particular care when interpreting a score as current sporting performance.

This page does not list completed research publications. Proposed studies will need documented results before supporting stronger claims.

Contact and collaboration

For questions about the project, methodology feedback or potential research collaboration, contact Mario Casamalhuapa through the FutbolFutbol contact page. No external collaborator or institution is represented as a formal partner here.

Contact FutbolFutbol

Research overview · Updated 13 October 2026